ABSTRACT
to analyse the reliability of 6 age intervals of Spanish web-based Ages and Stages Questionnaires Third Edition (WB-ASQ-3) and parents' acceptability, in a clinical practice context, during COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown in Chile. Cross-sectional study with a longitudinal component. Internal consistency was analysed by Cronbach's alpha and Pearson product-moment correlation, Pearson's correlations between intervals questionnaires were analysed. Acceptability was determined using a parental satisfaction survey. 1061 children completed 2318 validated questionnaires. Scores were compared with normative sample, except for Gross motor at 8 and 12 months, and Communication at 12, 18 and 24 months, without differences to the previous Chileans sample. In domain analysis, Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.36 to 0.80 and reached 0.74 to 0.81 for the overall test. Strong positive correlation between the domain and overall score was obtained. Correlation between most questionnaires at different ages was positive and significant. Parental surveys show high satisfaction;parents were thankful for being able to monitor children's development. WB-ASQ-3 is a reliable and feasible screening system, particularly when the test is taken as a whole, rather than by domains. It is remarkably high acceptability among parents, especially in complex times such as the lockdown and the COVID-19 pandemic. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) AD -, Paula Schonhaut, Luisa: lschonhaut@alemana.cl Schonhaut, Luisa: Clinica Alemana, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile Armijo, Ivan: Faculty of Psychology, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile Rojas B., Paula: Clinica Alemana, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile Cabrera, Leonardo: Clinica Alemana, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile Boisier, Roberto: Clinica Alemana, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
ABSTRACT
Objective: Overuse of video conferencing during the COVID-19 pandemic may contribute to the new mental health problem called 'Zoom fatigue'. This study examined convergent validity, factor validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the Thai version of the Zoom Exhaustion & Fatigue Scale (ZEF-T). Method(s): The participants were 386 medical students from Thammasat University. Convergent validity was based on comparing ZEF-T scores with the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey (MBI-SS). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was done to examine factor validity. Test-retest reliability was evaluated in 25 participants using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plot. Result(s): The ZEF-T demonstrated a positive correlation with emotional exhaustion of MBI-SS. (r = 0.42, p < 0.001). The CFA showed a satisfactory fit and supported the five-factor model with acceptable fit statistics. All items had factor loading of more than 0.7. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the total ZEF-T scores was excellent with the alpha of 0.93 and ICC 0.94 (p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion(s): The ZEF-T was shown to be a valid and reliable assessment for measuring zoom fatigue in Thai university students.Copyright © 2023 IACFS/ME.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Psychological requirements are extremely important in the formation of a person's personality and conduct. During the COVID-19 epidemic in Jouf, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the goal of the current study was to determine the psychological and medical requirements of Saudi children. Method(s): The research received responses from 205 mothers in total, 90 of whom were the mothers of male children and 105 of whom were the mothers of female children. The investigation was carried out during the global COVID-19 epidemic that also afflicted the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The study made use of a 42-item measure measuring psychosocial and health needs across four categories. Result(s): Whether the study's findings were based on the children's overall score or their academic, psychological, or health requirements, it was discovered that these needs were modest. From the perspective of their moms, neither gender nor class significantly affected the children's health or psychological requirements. Conclusion(s): This study suggests giving the kids family programs to take advantage of and manage their downtime and boost their levels of outdoor exercise.Copyright © 2022, Universidade de Sao Paulo. Museu de Zoologia. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
The paper presents the results of the study on development and standardization of the "COVID-19 Vaccine Attitude Scale" (COVID- 19 VAS) questionnaire. The study sample includes N = 1965 undergraduate, specialist and master students, of which N = 1592 (81%) are women and N = 373 (19%) are men aged 16 to 60 years, mean age M = 24.7, SD = 8.4, Me = 21.0. Study was conducted at Moscow State University of Psychology & Education (MSUPE). The questionnaire structure includes 5 scales identified by the method of exploratory factor analysis: Scale 1 "The benefits of vaccination against COVID-19 for an individual and society", Scale 2 "Fear of incidental effects of vaccination against COVID-19 and distrust of information about the vaccination safety", Scale 3 "Denial of the danger of coronavirus and hope for natural immunity", Scale 4 "Confidence in the serious negative consequences of the coronavirus vaccine" and Scale 5 "Disbelief in the proven international level effectiveness of Russian vaccines". The construct validity of the questionnaire was statistically proved. Confirmatory factor analysis verified satisfactory goodness-of-fit between the empirical data and the questionnaire structure. The scales are moderately intercorrelated, and the directions of the correlations correspond to the expected ones. The high internal reliability of all scales is statistically confirmed with the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Satisfactory convergent validity of the corresponding scales of the "COVID-19 Vaccine Attitude Scale (COVID-19 VAS)" with natural science literacy, intelligence and fear of COVID-19 disease is also confirmed. All correlations are weak, but theoretically expected and explainable. The differential validity is statistically proved. Stanines are calculated. The COVID-19 VAS can be recommended for preparation, realization and evaluation of the effectiveness of educational activities on vaccine prevention against COVID-19 among university students.
ABSTRACT
Background: It is important to understand HCWs' (healthcare workers) psychological responses to the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic as theare exposed to the virus on a daily basis. This study helps identify some of the challenges they face. Aim: The overall aim of the study was to investigate psychological responses to COVID-19, including vaccinations and stressors, amongst healthcarHCWs in South Africa during the pandemic. Setting: HCWs who worked in private and state hospitals and private practice in Tshwane, South Africa. Methods: A quantitative approach using a cross-sectional survey design was used. Several standardised and validated questionnaires were used in the surveincluding the Coronavirus-19 Fear Scale, the COVID-19-related stigma scale and the COVID-19 stress scale. A purposive sample (N=103) waanalysed using descriptive statistics and chi-square. Results: There were 103 completed questionnaires. Many (76% and 54%) either knew someone close who contracted COVID or died from COVID-19respectively. Most (58%) were in favour of being vaccinated. A significant proportion (42%;p= 0.009) of the HCWs felt uncomfortable whethinking about COVID. Physical reactions such as sweating, or a pounding heart were reported by 17% of the HCWs. A majority of the HCWdisagreed with any form of stigmatization of COVID-19. Most of the HCWs expressed a need for mental health support during the COVID-1pandemic. About three-quarters of the respondents expressed a need to talk to someone about their worries about COVID-19. Conclusion: Most of the respondents either knew someone who either contracted COVID-19 or died because of it. Many experienced anxiety symptoms whethinking about COVID-19. Many HCWs reported anxiety and stress symptoms such as insomnia, palpitations, sweating and difficultconcentrating. An overwhelming majority of the HCWs stated that people should not be discriminated against or stigmatized in any way because oCOVID-19. The majority of the HCWs expressed a need for psychological support during the COVID-19 pandemic. About 20% of the HCWwere against being vaccinated. This is worrisome as they are at high risk. The HCWs clearly expressed a need for more attention and supportowards their mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. © 2023 Nel et al.
ABSTRACT
Health care providers (HCPs) worldwide have been a common target for stigmatization during widespread infections, such as COVID-19. The purpose of this study is to highlight the prevalence of stigmatization during the COVID-19 pandemic among HCPs in Turkey using the Stigma COVID-19 HCPs instrument (S19-HCPs). Descriptive design. The S19-HCPs is a self-administered, web-based survey (24 items) developed previously. The internal consistency of the S19-HCPs' Turkish version was satisfactory (alpha = 0.79). Test-retest correlations were all statistically significant for the Turkish version of the instrument (ICC = 0.90, p0.01). Most study participants were 20-30 years old (77%);among the respondents, 66% had worked in a COVID-19-designated facility. Stigma against HCPs is highly prevalent in Turkey. The outcomes of this study revealed substantial levels of HCP stigmatization in Turkey irrespective of their motivation to work with COVID-19 patients. Education, media, and awareness campaigns might play a critical role in addressing global stigmatization issues.Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
ABSTRACT
The paper presents the results of the study on development and standardization of the "COVID-19 Vaccine Attitude Scale” (COVID-19 VAS) questionnaire. The study sample includes N = 1965 undergraduate, specialist and master students, of which N = 1592 (81%) are women and N = 373 (19%) are men aged 16 to 60 years, mean age M = 24.7, SD = 8.4, Me = 21.0. Study was conducted at Moscow State University of Psychology & Education (MSUPE). The questionnaire structure includes 5 scales identified by the method of exploratory factor analysis: Scale 1 "The benefits of vaccination against COVID-19 for an individual and society", Scale 2 "Fear of incidental effects of vaccination against COVID-19 and distrust of information about the vaccination safety", Scale 3 "Denial of the danger of coronavirus and hope for natural immunity”, Scale 4 "Confidence in the serious negative consequences of the coronavirus vaccine” and Scale 5 "Disbelief in the proven international level effectiveness of Russian vaccines”. The construct validity of the questionnaire was statistically proved. Confirmatory factor analysis verified satisfactory goodness-of-fit between the empirical data and the questionnaire structure. The scales are moderately intercorrelated, and the directions of the correlations correspond to the expected ones. The high internal reliability of all scales is statistically confirmed with the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Satisfactory convergent validity of the corresponding scales of the "COVID-19 Vaccine Attitude Scale (COVID-19 VAS)” with natural science literacy, intelligence and fear of COVID-19 disease is also confirmed. All correlations are weak, but theoretically expected and explainable. The differential validity is statistically proved. Stanines are calculated. The COVID-19 VAS can be recommended for preparation, realization and evaluation of the effectiveness of educational activities on vaccine prevention against COVID-19 among university students. © 2022 National Research University Higher School of Economics. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Parents of an infant may be particularly vulnerable to peritraumatic distress (e.g., psychological distress experienced during or immediately following a traumatic event) associated with events such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Since peritraumatic distress could affect both their psychological well-being and their couple relationship functioning, it is essential to measure and document these symptoms within parents. The COVID-19 Peritraumatic Distress Index (CPDI;Qiu et al., 2020) was the first validated instrument to measure COVID-19 peritraumatic distress, but it has not yet been validated in French. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the French-Canadian version of the CPDI (F-CPDI) in a sample of 492 parents (58% of mothers) of an infant in Quebec Province (Canada). The factor structure, internal consistency, and convergent validity of the instrument were tested. Results indicate that the F-CPDI has good internal consistency and supports the four-factor structure proposed by the authors of the original instrument. Results of correlation analyses indicated that peritraumatic distress was related to increased psychological distress, postpartum depression, and lower life satisfaction. Results indicate satisfactory psychometric qualities for the F-CPDI, providing researchers and mental health professionals access to a COVID-19 peritraumatic distress measure. This questionnaire can be used to assess peritraumatic distress in parents of an infant during a pandemic period, which is a first step towards offering adapted intervention strategies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) (French) Les parents d'un nouveau-ne peuvent etre particulierement vulnerables a la detresse peritraumatique (c'est-a-dire la detresse psychologique vecue pendant ou immediatement apres un evenement traumatique) associee a des evenements tels que la pandemie de COVID-19. Puisque la detresse peritraumatique pourrait affecter a la fois leur bien-etre psychologique et le fonctionnement de leur relation de couple, il est essentiel de mesurer et de documenter ces symptomes chez les parents. L'indice de detresse peritraumatique reliee a la COVID-19 (IDPC;Qiu et al., 2020) a ete le premier instrument valide pour mesurer la detresse peritraumatique reliee a la COVID-19, mais il n'a pas encore ete valide en francais. Cette etude visait a evaluer les proprietes psychometriques de la version franco-canadienne du CPDI (l'IDPC en francais) aupres d'un echantillon de 492 parents (58 % de meres) d'un nouveau-ne dans la province de Quebec (Canada). La structure factorielle, la coherence interne et la validite convergente de l'instrument ont ete testees. Les resultats indiquent que l'IDPC a une bonne coherence interne et soutient la structure a quatre facteurs proposee par les auteurs de l'instrument original. Les resultats des analyses de correlation indiquent que la detresse peritraumatique est liee a une detresse psychologique accrue, a la depression post-partum et a une satisfaction de vie moindre. Les resultats indiquent des qualites psychometriques satisfaisantes pour l'IDPC, permettant aux chercheurs et aux professionnels de la sante mentale d'avoir acces a un indice de detresse peritraumatique reliee a la COVID-19. Ce questionnaire peut etre utilise pour evaluer la detresse peritraumatique des parents d'un nouveau-ne en periode de pandemie, ce qui constitue une premiere etape pour proposer des strategies d'intervention adaptees. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) Impact Statement The COVID-19 pandemic is associated with an increase in mental health problems, including peritraumatic distress (Qiu et al., 2020). This study tested the validity of the French-Canadian COVID-19 Peritraumatic Distress Index (F-CPDI;Qiu et al., 2020), the first validated instrument to measure COVID-19 peritraumatic distress. Results revealed satisfactory psychometric qualities for the F-CPDI and prevalence rate of peritraumatic distress reaching 20.5% in Quebec parents of an infant. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
ABSTRACT
Background: Older adults with pre-existing health conditions such as cancer are at higher risks of COVID-related morbidity and mortality. Moreover, the pandemic has triggered new sources of anxiety and stress impairing their quality of life (QoL), such as fear of infection, financial challenges, and social isolation. The goal of this study is to evaluate the changes in QoL of breast cancer patients and survivors during the pandemic and assess whether racial/ethnic minority patients were disproportionately affected. As the COVID-19 vaccines become available, another goal of the study is to examine the vaccination rate and symptoms after vaccination among patients of different racial/ethnic groups. Method(s): Two waves of surveys were sent out to the breast cancer patients registered in the Chicago Multiethnic Epidemiologic Breast Cancer Cohort (ChiMEC) via RedCap in the summers of 2020 and 2021 with response rates of > 48%. To measure anxiety and stress, we calculated an overall score (ranging from 0-44) using 11 questions on a 5-point Likert scale, with lower score representing better QoL. The questions were adopted from existing item banks, and the items showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.84). The second survey also contained questions on vaccination status, concerns, and symptoms after vaccination. Result(s): In the first wave of survey in 2020, no significant racial differences were found in the anxiety/stress scores among the 1300 breast cancer patients. In the second wave of survey in 2021, 1348 patients responded, with 66% of them also respondents of the previous survey. Compared to 2020, the average anxiety/stress score in 2021 decreased from 13.2 to 12.2 for White patients, while increased from 12.8 to 13.6 for Black patients. Mixed effects models showed that the scores worsened significantly for Black patients while improved significantly for White patients. Compared to Whites, Black patients were significantly less confident to find medical help and keep up with work/home responsibilities, while significantly more likely to feel isolated and overwhelmed, and more frequently worried about being sick and going to hospitals. The racial differences in the anxiety/stress scores became insignificant after adjusting for annual household income in multivariate linear mixed effect models. In terms of Covid-19 vaccination, 92.2% of the respondents got vaccinated, with no significant racial/ethnic difference. However, there were more Black patients who had not decided yet or did not respond to this question (Table). The major concerns for patients were the long-term and short-term side effects of the vaccines. In terms of symptoms after vaccination, the most reported symptoms were pain at injection site (62.0%), tiredness (50.2%) and muscle or body aches (30.8%). Conclusion(s): Through a longitudinal study, we found that although the anxiety/stress scores of our patients remained moderate, White patients were having improved QoL while Black patients were doing worse. A third wave of survey is planned in the summer of 2022 to further examine this trend. In our study, the vaccination rates were very high among all racial/ethnic groups and the symptoms after vaccination were similar to the ones demonstrated in the general population. We hope that this information can proactively address some patients' concerns about getting vaccinated.
ABSTRACT
Background: The existing literature has predominantly focused on instructor social presence in videos in an asynchronous learning environment and little is known about student social presence on webcam in online learning in the context of COVID‐19. Objectives: This paper therefore contrasts students' and teachers' perspectives on student social presence on webcam in synchronous online teaching through co‐orientation analysis. Methods: Data were collected through an online questionnaire with 14 statements that measured participants' perceptions of webcam use in three constructs in social presence (i.e., emotional expression, open communication, and cohesion). 154 students and 36 teachers from two higher education institutions in Hong Kong responded to the questionnaire, and their responses were analysed using the co‐orientation model. Results and conclusion: Results reveal the perceptual gaps between teachers and students on the use of webcam to promote student social presence by showing how teachers were comparatively more positive about its impacts for learning and consistently overestimated students' preference for it. Through analysing individual constructs/items, this paper argues that using webcams in synchronous online learning could enhance student social presence only to a limited extent in that it may help improve emotional expression and open communication but not cohesion. Implications: The paper advises against the adoption of a clear‐cut policy that webcams should be either recommended or not recommended for online learning. Instead, teachers should take into account students' perspective to find out the types of activities that are apt for using webcams in online learning, and reflective tasks and oral assessments were amongst the ones considered appropriate by students in the study. Lay Description: What is currently known about the subject matter: Teacher presence through videoconferencing is important to the construction of social presence.Student presence on webcam is relatively understudied in online learning during COVID‐19.Teachers struggled to use webcams for online learning during the pandemic.Teachers and students have different concerns about using webcams for online learning that either party may not be aware of. What this paper adds: The current study contrasted teachers' and students' perceptions of student presence on webcam in online learning under COVID‐19.This is the first study using co‐orientation model as the analytical method for this area.There were perceptual differences between students and teachers on the use of webcams in which teachers were comparatively more positive about its impacts for learning and consistently overestimated students' preference for it.Using webcams in synchronous online learning could enhance social presence only to a limited extent in that it may help improve emotional expression and open communication but not cohesion. Implications of study findings for practitioners: The paper advises against the adoption of a clear‐cut policy that webcams should be either recommended or not recommended for online learning.Teachers should take into account students' perspective to find out the types of activities that are apt for using webcams in online learning, and reflective tasks and oral assessments were amongst the ones considered appropriate by students in the study.It reveals how co‐orientation model can be a useful tool for perception studies in higher education.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To determine the perception of risks and ways of coping with covid19 and to find the future outlook of covid19 from citizens of our area. Methodology: This quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted in one week from Rawalpindi and Islamabad through online access and included 310 subjects. Data were collected using Likert score-based questionnaire using non probability convenient sampling technique. Both genders older than 18 years were recruited. Data were analyzed using SPSS 21. Result(s): Majority of the participants showed likely response regarding risk perception for being infected by Covid-19 and that Covid-19 was a global disaster. However, 34.5% showed unlikely response that Covid19 will become dangerous over time. The age group of 21 to 24 years mostly agreed that they will cope with it if Covid-19 outbreak will happen again in future. Conclusion(s): Majority of the participants showed likely response regarding risk perception for being infected by Covid-19 and they perceive that listening to the expert advice, changing of things in life, avoiding the public transport and washing hands frequently are the best coping strategies for Covid-19. Most responded that Covid-19 will end in near future and they can cope with it if it outbreaks again in future by practicing SOPs, and that they will be able to live a normal life in future.Copyright © 2023, Pakistan Medical Association. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Non-technical skills (NTS) assessment tools are widely used to provide formative and summative assessment for healthcare professionals and there are now many of them. This study has examined three different tools designed for similar settings and gathered evidence to test their validity and usability. METHODS: Three NTS assessment tools designed for use in the UK were used by three experienced faculty to review standardized videos of simulated cardiac arrest scenarios: ANTS (Anesthetists' Non-Technical Skills), Oxford NOTECHS (Oxford NOn-TECHnical Skills) and OSCAR (Observational Skill based Clinical Assessment tool for Resuscitation). Internal consistency, interrater reliability and quantitative and qualitative analysis of usability were analyzed for each tool. RESULTS: Internal consistency and interrater reliability (IRR) varied considerably for the three tools across NTS categories and elements. Intraclass correlation scores of three expert raters ranged from poor (task management in ANTS [0.26] and situation awareness (SA) in Oxford NOTECHS [0.34]) to very good (problem solving in Oxford NOTECHS [0.81] and cooperation [0.84] and SA [0.87] in OSCAR). Furthermore, different statistical tests of IRR produced different results for each tool. Quantitative and qualitative examination of usability also revealed challenges in using each tool. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of standardization of NTS assessment tools and training in their use is unhelpful for healthcare educators and students. Educators require ongoing support in the use of NTS assessment tools for the evaluation of individual healthcare professionals or healthcare teams. Summative or high-stakes examinations using NTS assessment tools should be undertaken with at least two assessors to provide consensus scoring. In light of the renewed focus on simulation as an educational tool to support and enhance training recovery in the aftermath of COVID-19, it is even more important that assessment of these vital skills is standardized, simplified and supported with adequate training.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Clinical Competence , Humans , Adult , Reproducibility of Results , Health Personnel , Educational MeasurementABSTRACT
This study examined the effects of online group art therapy on adults who lost family members using three instruments to measure depression, grief, and quality of life in a randomized controlled trial. Of the thirty-six participants who experienced the death of a family member, 20 were assigned to the experimental group participating in online group art therapy over eight sessions 1-hour once a week, and 16 were assigned to the control group with no intervention. In the experimental group, online group art therapy reduced depression and grief while improving the quality of life. The findings show the promise of online group art therapy in helping adults who have lost family members by relieving psychological distress and enhancing their quality of life. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd
ABSTRACT
The paper presents the results of the study on development and standardization of the "COVID-19 Vaccine Attitude Scale" (COVID- 19 VAS) questionnaire. The study sample includes N = 1965 undergraduate, specialist and master students, of which N = 1592 (81%) are women and N = 373 (19%) are men aged 16 to 60 years, mean age M = 24.7, SD = 8.4, Me = 21.0. Study was conducted at Moscow State University of Psychology & Education (MSUPE). The questionnaire structure includes 5 scales identified by the method of exploratory factor analysis: Scale 1 "The benefits of vaccination against COVID-19 for an individual and society", Scale 2 "Fear of incidental effects of vaccination against COVID-19 and distrust of information about the vaccination safety", Scale 3 "Denial of the danger of coronavirus and hope for natural immunity", Scale 4 "Confidence in the serious negative consequences of the coronavirus vaccine" and Scale 5 "Disbelief in the proven international level effectiveness of Russian vaccines". The construct validity of the questionnaire was statistically proved. Confirmatory factor analysis verified satisfactory goodness-of-fit between the empirical data and the questionnaire structure. The scales are moderately intercorrelated, and the directions of the correlations correspond to the expected ones. The high internal reliability of all scales is statistically confirmed with the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Satisfactory convergent validity of the corresponding scales of the "COVID-19 Vaccine Attitude Scale (COVID-19 VAS)" with natural science literacy, intelligence and fear of COVID-19 disease is also confirmed. All correlations are weak, but theoretically expected and explainable. The differential validity is statistically proved. Stanines are calculated. The COVID-19 VAS can be recommended for preparation, realization and evaluation of the effectiveness of educational activities on vaccine prevention against COVID-19 among university students.
ABSTRACT
Objective. Adapt the COVID Stress Scales (CSS), gathering psychometric evidence, and to verify the pattern of relationship with anxiety compared to COVID-19. Method. Two studies were carried out with participants from different Brazilian states. In the first (n = 423) the exploratory factor analysis suggested a pentafactorial structure. In the second (n = 300), a confirmatory factor analysis was performed, testing a pentafactorial model. Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity was gathered. Pearson's correlation (r) was performed, which showed positive and statistically significant relationships between anxiety and stress in the face of COVID, indicating validity based on external measure. Results. Satisfactory internal consistency was found in both studies. It is concluded that the CSS is valid and reliable and can assist in the assessment of individuals with stress caused by the COVID pandemic and its correlated factors.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Approximately 18% of preschoolers have significant mental health problems, yet there is no agreed-upon standard of care for routine identification of psychiatric problems in young children. This study evaluated the screening test accuracy and reliability of the parent-report Preschool SDQ (P-SDQ) in primary care settings. Method(s): A total of 183 healthy children, 2 to 4 years old, enrolled in a longitudinal cohort through a multisite primary care research network. Parents completed the P-SDQ at baseline and at 2 and 12 weeks later. At 12 weeks, 107 parents participated in a semi-structured diagnostic phone interview, the Preschool Age Psychiatric Assessment (PAPA);criterion validity between the P-SDQ scores at baseline and the presence of psychiatric diagnoses (Dx) at 12 weeks was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), 95% CI. We assessed the test-retest reliability using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC 2,1) and internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha for the total difficulties score (TDS), and internalizing (INT) and externalizing (EXT) subscales using data at baseline and 2 weeks. Result(s): Of 183 parents (child mean age 39.3 months;46.4% male), 120 completed the P-SDQ at 2 weeks. Among the 107 (58.4%) who participated in the PAPA, 26 (24.3%) children had any diagnosis (Dx), 22 (21%) had INT Dx, and 9 (8%) had EXT Dx. The TDS performed satisfactorily against any Dx with AUC = 0.67 (0.55-0.79). The AUC for an EXT Dx and INT Dx were 0.77 (0.60-0.94) and 0.61 (0.47-0.74), respectively. A threshold of >10 for the TDS had 50% sensitivity and 78% specificity to identify any Dx. A threshold of >7 for the INT scale had 18% sensitivity and 99% specificity to identify an INT Dx. A threshold of >6 for the EXT scale had 78% sensitivity and 71% specificity to identify an EXT Dx. ICC (2,1) for TDS, INT, and EXT scores were 0.72, 0.62, and 0.79, respectively. Internal consistency of the TDS was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.72). Conclusion(s): The screening test accuracy and reliability of the P-SDQ total difficulties score supports its use to identify young children at risk for psychiatric diagnoses, and in particular externalizing diagnoses, in primary care. Limitations include the small sample size and adjustments to recruitment during COVID-19. DIAG, PSC, ADMIN Copyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
Aims: The goal of this project is to validate an instrument for measuring dental students' mental health outcomes due to COVID-19. Method(s): The instrument consists of 13 items measuring various aspects ofmental health issues arising from COVID-19. It was administered to 145 dental students. Summary statistics, item and person reliabilities, dimensionality, item targeting and gender bias were assessed. Result(s): Of the items evaluated, they showed excellent reliability (Item = 0.97;person = 0.86). The instrument targeted the dental students very well, and was fairly unidimensional.All of the items were free of gender bias. Interitem correlations were 0.89 on average (95% CI 0.86-0.91), demonstrating good internal consistency. Conclusion(s): The present study applied rigorous, advanced psychometric analysis to assess and validate a novel mental health instrument that specifically measures COVID-19 mental health outcomes in dental students. The instrument showed excellent measurement properties. It can serve as a valuable tool for evaluating the effectiveness of intervention programs that aim to improve students' mental health outcomes related to COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
Aims: The prevalence of Occupational Burnout has skyrocketed during the Covid-19 pandemic, especially among healthcare professionals (HCP). Hence, it is crucial to have robust measures for ascertaining burnout in this population. The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) is the most widely used measure in burnout research, but fundamental methodological flaws permeated its development. The Shirom-Melamed Burnout Questionnaire/Measure is a prevalent tool used by the Swedish Health System to diagnose burnout and plan the delivery of mental health services. The 14-item Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure (SMBM) was developed after a methodological revision of the 22-item Shirom-Melamed Burnout Questionnaire (SMBQ). Studies on the psychometric properties of the SMBM exist, but the assessment of the methodological quality of individual studies is lacking. To address this gap, the purpose of this study is to critically appraise the quality of the measurement properties of the 14-item SMBM among HCP. Method(s): Four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus) were searched for studies on the psychometric properties of the 14-item SMBM among HCP. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. Evidence supporting the measurement properties of the SMBM was synthesized and graded using the GRADE approach. Result(s): We identified three studies on the psychometric properties of the 14-item SMBM among HCP. One study on the 12-item SMBM was included to estimate content validity. We found a high quality of evidence for internal consistency, moderate quality of evidence for structural and crosscultural validity, and low quality of evidence for hypothesis testing. Most importantly, we found that PROM development and content validity were inadequate. Conclusion(s): Although informed by the Conservation of Resources Theory, the 14-item SMBM warrants revision to engage critical stakeholders for concept elicitation and cognitive interview. Both processes will contribute to the relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of the PRO items.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: COVID-19-related stigma has been raised as a crisis since the beginning of the pandemic. We intended to develop a valid and reliable questionnaire to measure COVID-19-related stigma, attributed by the non-infected general population, and applied it in Tehran from September to October 2020. Objective(s): This study measures the COVID-19-related stigma attributed by the non-infected general population using a valid and reliable questionnaire specific to COVID-19-related stigma. Method(s): A preliminary questionnaire with 18 items was developed. The score ranged from 18 to 54 while the higher score indicating a higher level of COVID-19-related stigma. Out of 1064 randomly recruited Tehran citizens without a history of COVID-19 infection, 630 participants, who completely responded to the questions on a phone call, entered the study. Result(s): The content validity was established with a scale content validity index of 0.90. Item CVI and Item content validity ratio were higher than 0.78 for all items. Internal consistency was confirmed with Cronbach's alpha of 0.625. Exploratory factor analysis revealed seven latent variables, including "blaming and penaltyseeking behavior", "social discrimination", "dishonor label", "interpersonal contact", "spreading rumors and myths", "overvalued idea", and "apathy toward the patients". The mean (SD) of the score was 25.1(4.71) in our study. 86.8% of participants reported a low level of stigma with a score below 31. 13.2% of them demonstrated a moderate level of stigma, and none of the participants showed a high level of stigma. Conclusion(s): we found a low level of stigmatizing thoughts and behavior in Tehran, which may be due to social desirability bias.
ABSTRACT
(Portuguese) O esgotamento emocional academico e o primeiro estagio da Sindrome de Burnout Academico, sendo necessario avalia-lo e intervir precocemente, pois as consequencias sao significativas para as pessoas. O objetivo desta pesquisa e realizar uma analise psicometrica da Escala de Cansaco Emocional (Escala de Cansancio Emocional, ECE) para avaliar sua estrutura interna, invariancia de medida e confiabilidade da consistencia interna, em uma amostra de estudantes universitarios equatorianos no contexto da pandemia COVID-19. Participaram 453 estudantes universitarios do Equador (76,21 % mulheres) entre 17 e 35 anos (M = 22,76 anos). Os resultados mostram que a estrutura unidimensional possui suporte estatistico, e invariavel em relacao ao sexo e apresenta adequada confiabilidade de consistencia interna. Conclui-se que a ECE possui propriedades psicometricas adequadas que permitem seu uso em estudantes universitarios equatorianos. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) (Spanish) El agotamiento emocional academico es la primera etapa del sindrome de burnout academico, y es necesario evaluarlo e intervenir temprano ya que las consecuencias son significativas para las personas. El objetivo de esta investigacion es realizar un analisis psicometrico de la Escala de Cansancio Emocional (ECE) para evaluar su estructura interna, invariancia de medida y confiabilidad de consistencia interna, en una muestra de estudiantes universitarios ecuatorianos en el contexto de la pandemia COVID-19. Participaron 453 estudiantes universitarios de Ecuador (76.21 % mujeres) de entre 17 y 35 anos (M = 22.76 anos). Los resultados muestran que la estructura unidimensional tiene soporte estadistico, es invariante en cuanto al sexo y muestra una adecuada confiabilidad de consistencia interna. Se concluye que la ECE tiene propiedades psicometricas adecuadas que permiten su uso en estudiantes universitarios ecuatorianos. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)